|
|
|
|
| Title: | There Is No Antimemetics Division |
| Author: | Sam Hughes, under the name "qntm" |
| Year: | 2025 |
| Genre: | Cosmic horror, SciFi |
| Wikipedia: | link |
This is a spoiler-free review for There Is No Antimemetics Division, a 2025 SciFi cosmic horror novel by Sam Hughes, writing under his Internet handle "qntm". It is a rare case of a full 4-star review on this review page, and I highly recommend it — with the caveat that the less you know going in, the better. So, yes, this review will be as spoiler-free as a review can possibly be, but my personal recommendation is for you to simply stop reading now, get the book, and just read it.
What do you mean you don't have it? Just ask me and I'll lend it to you.
There Is No Antimemetics Division is not high literature, and at no point ever tries to pretend it is. If you're on the market for flowery language, clever metaphors, alliteration, iambic pentameter, or allusions to Proust, this is not the book for you.
What it is is a well-paced, well-structured, engagingly-written entry into the cosmic horror genre that innovates on it perhaps more than had been done since the genre's original inception by H.P. Lovecraft.
It is also — and this perhaps first and foremost — a spectacularly intelligent book. It is intelligently written, filled with likeable (and sometimes not likeable) resourceful, intelligent characters, doing intelligent things, and is aimed at an intelligent reader. As I was reading it, occasionally I was able to connect some of the dots, and for a while prided myself on being ahead of the writer, ready for the coming big reveal... only to realise later that this book is remarkably short on big reveals. What you are able to piece together on your own is what you come away with, and anything you missed, you missed. I am now reading the novel for the second time, and am beginning to realise just how much I had missed the first time around. The novel actively rewards you for keeping your brain on.
Even worse were instances where I thought I had spotted a logical inconsistency in the narrative. Not that there aren't any inconsistencies — in writing fiction, and in particular horror fiction, breaking the rules is part of the game — but almost invariably, if you're experiencing a moment of "gotcha" while reading this book, thinking that you have just outwitted the writer, chances are, you are merely toyed with, and will soon discover that Hughes was ahead of you all along.
Not that any of this will help you guessing ahead where the plot is headed. The book is filled with completely unexpected twists at every turn that are thoroughly entertaining, entirely unforeseeable, and yet 100% inevitable in retrospect: these are not subversions for the sake of subverting, but rather five-dimensional chess played under your very nose, where other novelists dabble at backgammon.
Now, I know that for many readers the choice of genre — horror, let alone cosmic horror — is enough to serve as a big stop sign. I am of two minds about such objections. On the one hand, I'll freely admit that all tropes of the genre are present and correct, from the body-horror elements to the creepy-crawlies, and there are certainly places where the novel is out to scare you.
On the other hand, I think all these tropes are presented with a smirk, the novel barely paying lip-service to them, and the places where the novel wishes to scare are structured more like thriller elements than like horror elements.
Moreover, the cosmic horror sub-genre is the perfect choice for such "light-on-horror" entries, because whereas general horror typically relies on atmospherics — the protagonist stumbling through darkness, fearing physical threat by an assailant that they cannot see — cosmic horror can, and in this case does, rely on protagonists that see too much. Whether what they see scares you (and in what way) is at this point up to you, and, again, the more you keep your brain switched on and the more you immerse yourself in the tale, the more you will get out of it. In this context, There Is No Antimemetics Division has far more in common with X: The Man With the X-Ray Eyes (1963) than it has with A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984).
But, again, the book demonstrates clearly and early on that it very much is a horror book. So, if you are very squeamish don't come complaining to me that I presented it as some "horror lite". It's more of a case of a work meant to be a fun horror read, rather than an unpleasant or downright nightmare-inducing horror read. Hughes is not trying to be the next Stephen King. He is more the Andy Weir of horror.
In the end, smart books aimed at smart readers are few and far between. It's a wonder they can be published at all, as I wouldn't want to guess at the size of the market. But this novel, discussing "memes" (ideas that spread like wildfire) and "antimemes" (ideas that cannot be spread at all), has in the months since its original release become its own meme, spreading from reader to reader mainly by strong word of mouth and "You've just got to read this" recommendations, and mine is no different.
So, do yourself a favour. Ask no further questions. Learn nothing more about the novel's contents. Get a copy and read it. You'll thank me later.